ROE Full - New York Citizens Audit

New York’s 2022
General Election &
The Reign of Error:

APATHY, INCOMPETENCE,
OR MALFEASANCE?

A Report Produced by New York Citizens Audit

The findings in this report are based upon the three basic
tenets of an election:

1 Voter rolls must be accurate,

2 Votes counted must be from qualified electors,

3 The number of votes counted must equal
the number of voters who voted.

As well as the following principles in federal law:

1 Every point of administration of a federal election
must create an auditable record1;

2 These records can be used to validate
the accuracy of election results2;

3 The maximum allowable error rate in a valid,
trusted election is 1/125,000 ballots in error3.

11142023

▲

VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE

IT’S THE LAW

Our US Congress recognized in 1993 that in order to secure government by consent, the principle of American liberty
and justice upon which our constitutional republic was founded, the electoral process must be protected by maintaining
accurate voter rolls:

52 USC 20501 (National Voter Registration Act of 1993.)

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) FINDINGS—The Congress finds that—

(1) the right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right;

(b) PURPOSES—The purposes of this Act are—

(3) to protect the integrity of the electoral process; and

(4) to ensure that accurate and current voter registration rolls are maintained.

Congress was right. A voter registration record is granted a ballot. Eligibility must be verified before any applicant can be
registered. Maintenance of registration lists must be scrupulous. If a name appears on the list of registered voters, it is
presumed to be legitimate, and allowed to cast a vote.

“Accurate” as defined in Merriam-Webster dictionary:

1: free from error especially as the result of care

2: conforming exactly to truth or to a standard

3: able to give an accurate result

INVALID REGISTRATION IN NEW YORK’S VOTER DATABASE

Through inspection of the voter rolls4 in New York State, NY Citizens Audit has discovered they are so inaccurate, the
circumstance is described under the law as a total “Loss of Control.”5 Federal and state laws regarding registration are
simply ignored. Millions of examples exist. Regardless of blanket excuses and denials from election officials, these
appear to be invalid or illegal registrations. Crimes against the elective franchise are being committed. Either the records
are improperly maintained, or the certification is false. Under federal prosecution guidelines, either one is a crime.

Here is a sampling of registration records from the New York State voter roll database (NYSVoter) as of December 19, 2022
that are seemingly invalid or illegal. Some of them could be given an affidavit ballot to vote at an in-person polling site
under state law, if a proper cure is presented. Although their presence in the database violates the federal principle of
accuracy due to ineligibility, current state law excuses that.

INELIGIBLE OR UNCERTAIN REGISTRATION TYPE

NUMBER OF INSTANCES

Illegal duplicate registrations (see page 3)

1,467,399

Registered after 2022 GE cutoff date, yet voted

9,766

Purged with no purge date

1,545,711

Purged records that were never active (see page 5)

712,360

Registered after last voted date

143,226

Voter identity unverified

201,908

Age discrepant registrants (older than the 115yo,
the oldest known person in the US)

20,023

Registered before age 16

4,910

Blank address registrants

48,784

January 1st registration date, 1900-2022

988,863

1. VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE Irregular Registration

ILLEGAL DUPLICATE REGISTRATIONS

Illegal duplicates are new registrations based on a particular voter who already has a record in the database. So now we
have two or more unique voters who are really the same. This creates the opportunity for multiple votes to be cast by, or
assigned to, the same identity. In some cases the original registration is real and verifiable by direct canvass. In other cases
the original is unverifiable by direct canvass or other means; the “voter” appears to be fictitious.

FEDERAL LAW IS CLEAR ABOUT “DUPLICATE” REGISTRATIONS IN THE VOTER ROLL DATABASES:

52 USC 21083 (Help America Vote Act of 2002)

SEC. 303. Computerized statewide voter registration list requirements and
requirements for voters who register by mail.

(a) computerized statewide voter registration list requirements

(1) Implementation

(A) in general—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), each State, acting through the chief State
election official, shall implement, in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner, a single, uniform,
official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list defined, maintained,
and administered at the State level that contains the name and registration information of every
legally registered voter in the State and assigns a unique identifier to each legally registered
voter in the State.

EARLIER LAW ALSO ADDRESSES DUPLICATE ENTRIES IN VOTER ROLL DATABASES:

52 USC 20504 (National Voter Registration Act of 1993.)

SEC. 5. Simultaneous application for voter registration and application for motor vehicle driver’s
license.

(2) The voter registration application portion of an application for a State motor vehicle driver’s license—

(B) may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to—

(i) prevent duplicate voter registrations.

NEW YORK ELECTION LAW AGREES THAT EACH VOTER GETS ONE REGISTRATION:

NYS Election Law §5-614.4

There shall be one official record of the registration of each voter. Such record shall be maintained in an
interactive, statewide, computerized, voter registration list. Such statewide voter registration list shall
constitute the official list of voters for the state of New York.

NYCRR 6217.1

(b) NYSVoter shall maintain one record for each voter including the statewide unique identifier.

NYCRR 6217.5

(e) NYSVoter shall assign a unique identifier to every voter that
will remain with that voter for their voting life.

1. VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE Irregular Registration

New York State board of elections excuses 1,467,399 illegal duplicate registrations

In an official document targeting the efforts of NY Citizens Audit, “False Claims Explained,”6 The New York State board
of elections (NYSBOE) implies that these federal and state laws are not actually law. An excuse is given to dismiss
concerns about the board’s seeming disregard of election law. The lack of audit records demonstrating the veracity of
the excuse is notable, given it is part of an election official’s sworn, affirmative duty to provide evidence proving their
work meets the legal standard. The excuse does not address cases like A. Piamenta, an unverifiable “person” who has
eleven simultaneously active registrations at a single address where he is unknown and has apparently never lived. In
short, the excuse is unconvincing. Below is the excuse as provided by the NYSBOE in “False Claims Explained”:

Duplicated Voter IDs

Each voter in New York is assigned both a state voter ID and a county ID. Although the state database is designed to
have a single state ID follow a voter as they move from county to county, it is possible for multiple reasons that a voter
may have multiple records with different state IDs. For example, if a voter registered more than once using the DMV’s
online portal creating a duplicate record, their duplicate record may be purged, which would show the same voter and
name with two voter IDs. One record would be active and the second would be purged.

When NY Citizens Audit researchers searched the NYSVoter database as provided on December 19, 2022,
we found 1,467,399 illegal duplicate registrations. To find out if they voted, please turn to page 7, “Votes counted
must be from qualified electors.”

In the official DOJ publication, “Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, Eighth Edition, December 2017,” the
following federal crimes are identified:

• Submitting fictitious names to election officers for inclusion on voter registration rolls, thereby qualifying the
ostensible voters to vote in federal elections (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 20511(2)).

• Providing false information concerning a person’s name, address, or period of residence in a voting district to
establish that person’s eligibility to register or to vote in a federal election (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 20511(2)).

• Placing fictitious names on the voter rolls. This “deadwood” allows for fraudulent ballots, which can be used to
stuff the ballot box.

The law identifies each of these 1,467,399 illegal duplicate registrations as both illegal and suspicious.
The New York State board of elections must provide a line-by-line verification detailing how each one of them was
created, as well as the computer audit logs demonstrating every update to voter history. These records have been
requested by NY Citizens Audit via Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and access has unlawfully been denied.

1. VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE Irregular Registration

PURGED RECORDS THAT WERE NEVER ACTIVE

NY Citizens Audit discovered 712,360 voter registration records in NYSVoter that were never active.
At the time each record was created, it was given purged status. This is a conundrum, as a purged voter cannot get a
ballot under any circumstance. Why, then, did these “people” register?

These 712,360 records appear to be fraudulent. How they may have been used, exactly, remains unknown.
Again, the New York State board of elections must provide a line-by-line verification detailing how each one of them
was created, as well as the computer audit logs demonstrating every update to voter history.

INEXPLICABLE CHANGES TO THE VOTER ROLLS

NY Citizens Audit used three uniquely dated copies of NYSVoter to run a comparison, line-by-line, of anomalous
changes to the database. One copy is dated 10/21/2021, the second 10/24/2022, and the third was received on
12/19/2022. The results are inexplicable and possibly illegal:

Categories of Inexplicable Changes
to the Voter Rolls

Number of Changes

October 2021 –
October 2022

Number of Changes
October 2022 –
December 2022

Total Changes
over
14 months

Purged became inactive

6,586

6,589

Purged became active

45,260

274

45,534

Died became active

Purge date moved back in time

Purge date moved ahead in time

1,216

122

1,338

Purge date erased

7,171

229

7,400

Purged no purge date

56,772

36,627

93,399

Birth date moved back in time

3,226

835

4,061

Birth date moved ahead in time

3,672

927

4,599

First name altered

14,604

3,760

18,364

Last name altered*

12,502

3,267

15,769

New ID, same name

10,808

2,931

13,739

New Lname/Fname/DOB, same ID

New Lname/ID, same Fname/DOB

235

274

New Lname/DOB, same Fname/ID

256

328

TOTAL INEXPLICABLE VOTER ROLL CHANGES

157,820

48,103

211,771

*Married name changes not included

Each one of these changes would need to be manually done, based on a legitimate request by the voter, at the local
board of elections where the voter resides. This would be an average of 680 illogical registration changes per business
day, statewide. The boards of elections must produce every one of these record update requests, submitted by each
unique registrant, in order for this finding to be believed lawful.

1. VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE Irregular Registration

TOTAL LOSS OF CONTROL

In the spring of 2022, NY Citizens Audit Director of Research, Andrew Paquette, PhD, observed and began reverse-
engineering algorithmic patterns in the assignment of state and county voter ID numbers within NYSVoter.

On June 27, 2022, with the support of the team, this work was reported in person to the New York State Police Special
Investigations Unit. The report was considered credible and disturbing, and the inquiry passed to the Foreign Intelligence
Task Force of the FBI, which oversees investigation of national security risks to our voting systems.

On May 1, 2023, NY Citizens Audit presented the completed research on these algorithms to the New York State
legislature election committees, at the Legislative Office Building in Albany, room 711A.7

On May 16, 2023, Paquette published a peer-reviewed scientific research paper, “The Caesar Cipher and Stacking the
Deck in New York State Voter Rolls,” describing the algorithms, in the Journal of Information Warfare8. Three independent
cyber-intelligence experts agreed that the research was sound, and the database is embedded with steganographically
masked (hidden in plain sight) algorithms controlling the assignment of ID numbers.

This is blatantly illegal, and considered a total Loss of Control data breach by the Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency, the federal agency with the duty to protect critical national cyber infrastructure.
Neither the FBI, nor the legislators, nor any other officials have responded, despite having been presented credible
evidence of an existing national security breach within our voting system. It may be misconduct to ignore the report; each
of these people swore an oath to protect and uphold our US Constitution.

The breach may explain some of the invalid data discovered by NY Citizens Audit. There is a possibility that the
manipulation has been accomplished without knowledge of or participation by any New York election official. However,
the state board of election’s choice to defend millions of apparent material violations of clear election law, and refusal
to meet with honest citizen investigators, does not inspire trust. A full investigation must be launched immediately to
determine the source of this active, confirmed, illegal attack compromising the validity of our elections.

“Free and honest elections are the very foundation of our republican form of government.
Hence any attempt to defile the sanctity of the ballot cannot be viewed with
equanimity.” United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941)

1. VOTER ROLLS MUST BE ACCURATE Irregular Registration

Summary of votes cast in New York’s 2022 general election by ineligible
and uncertain registrations

These numbers were summed from a copy of NYSVoter dated 12/19/2022, after state level certification attested to the
accuracy and legal compliance of the election. A blank address or unverified registrant could be allowed to vote in person
after presenting ID, using an affidavit ballot. It is unknown at this time whether these 20,448 specific records were thus
cured before voting. NY Citizens Audit can confirm that procedure was not universally followed in 2020; votes were cast by
similarly invalid records for which there was no evidence provided, upon FOIL request, of curing.

INELIGIBLE OR UNCERTAIN REGISTRATION TYPE THAT VOTED

VOTES CAST IN 2022 GE

Illegal duplicate registrations

449,856

Illegal duplicate registrations – DOUBLE+ VOTES

2,440

Registered after 2022 GE cutoff date, yet voted

9,766

Purged with no purge date

942

Purged before the election

2,524

Registered after last voted date

2,597

Voter identity never verified

3,825

Age discrepant registrants (older than the oldest known person in the US, 115yo)

599

Registered before age 16

2,032

Blank address registrants

16,623

January 1st registration, all years 1900-2022

254,090

TOTAL APPARENT VOTING VIOLATIONS IN NY’S 2022 GE

745,294

▲

VOTES COUNTED MUST BE FROM
QUALIFIED ELECTORS

January 1st Registration Votes

Two categories of ineligible or uncertain registration clearly dwarf the pool of suspicious votes: illegal duplicates and January
1st registration dates. Again in “False Claims Explained,” the state board of elections has provided an excuse for registrations
created on federal holidays, 94% of which fall on New Years day:

Voters Registered on Federal Holidays
Voters that are pre-registered to vote will have their record activated on the day of their 18th birthday regardless of whether
that date is a holiday. Additionally, if records did not have a registration date stamp when entering the voter into the
electronic system, counties may have used January 1st as a placeholder day.

The “placeholder date” excuse attempts to cover provably false data in the voter rolls. Registration dates are material to
determining eligibility to vote. When dates are false, the true date is unknown, and eligibility cannot be certain. Further, this
does not explain why January 1st registration dates are assigned special ID numbers occupying key positions in the voter roll
algorithms that Andrew Paquette, PhD, reverse engineered, uncovering a highly complex and deliberate pattern with no
plausible, innocent explanation.

The following chart shows the first 24 rows of New York County data within NYSVoter, exactly as they originally
appeared upon receipt of the data. Close inspection reveals that every tenth registration has:

1. an alphanumeric county ID number, unlike the other 9 in each set of 10;

2. a nearly consecutive state ID number, “short ID,” suggesting uniformity and nearly synchronous registration;

3. a registration date of 1/1/1984, twenty years earlier than the other 9 in each set of 10.

Given this array of
contradictory characteristics,
and the loss of
control data breach, the
“placeholder” date
excuse is not plausible.
Each of the January 1st
registrant votes appears
strongly linked to
provable fraud.

2. VOTES COUNTED MUST BE FROM QUALIFIED ELECTORS

THE VOTES OF ELECTIONS PAST

NY Citizens Audit has discovered several types of inexplicable data manipulation including missing votes and blank votes.
The motive for these illegal changes is unknown. Each category requires immediate investigation.

Missing Votes:

According to NY election law, county and state voter rolls are real time replicas. The counties manage all registration
records, and the state database is a compilation of each county’s accurate rolls. The following data sets were extracted from
official records received via FOIL request:

County

County voters who voted,
2020 GE

NYSVoter 2020 GE votes,
same unique voters

Bronx

48,998

Kings

55,134

New York (Manhattan)

49,166

Queens

55,036

Richmond

46,379

TOTAL MISSING VOTES

254,713

According to this data, there is a very real possibility that 254,713 voters were disenfranchised by the boards of elections.
The NYSVoter database is considered the official record for administering federal elections, including voter history data.
The state board of elections must provide a line-by-line audit regarding each of these unique voters, and prove what
happened to their votes.

Blank Votes:

Another category of data manipulated post-certification is the count of blank ballots by county.9 Two counties stand out
as having likely violations in this category, due to the magnitude of injections and subtractions. Although Westchester
technically adjusted their data on the date of state certification, apparently squeezing in under the deadline, counties are
required to turn their certified data over to the state at least a week in advance of that deadline for state attestation of
accuracy and compliance. Additionally, it is unknown how Westchester could have legitimately tabulated over half a
million blank ballots.

County

Blanks Changed
12/4/2020

Blanks Changed
12/8/2020

Blanks Changed
6/18/2021

Orange

-33,370

+36,584

Westchester

+544,992

2. VOTES COUNTED MUST BE FROM QUALIFIED ELECTORS

When $35,312 goes missing from your bank account, is that a clerical error?

The New York State board of elections publishes an official results document on their website after every election. It includes
the total number of votes by race, county, and party. The total number of votes reported for the 2022 GE was 5,965,68410.

This number, however, has to have a basis in the raw data reported in NYSVoter, the official federal record11 of voter
registration and participation. NY Citizens Audit received a copy of NYSVoter on 12/19/2022, four days after certification.
When we tallied the voters who voted as recorded in NYSVoter, we were unable to reconcile the claim.

Official Source

Reported Total

NYSBOE Official Results of 2022 GE report

5,965,684 votes counted

NYSVoter raw data, official federal document

5,930,372 voters who voted

DIFFERENCE:

35,312 more votes counted than voters who voted

Certification of New York’s 2022 general election appears to be a federal crime; a civil rights violation acting
under color of law. Why?

Government by consent and the meaning of Certification

The King of America, the Law, is tethered to the Sovereign, the people, through the elective process. The loyalty of those
we temporarily assign the privilege of writing and enforcing law is checked only by the honesty of our elections.
Otherwise the King goes rogue. We cannot simultaneously have representative government and compromised elections.

Who is responsible for guaranteeing trustworthy elections? Under current federal law, each state has a chief election
official who swears to and attests that an election is both accurate and legally compliant. This is the menaing of certification.
Each of these individuals are bound to a sacred duty of maintaining accurate, valid, lawfully conducted elections, an
incredible honor upon which our liberty pivots.

52 USC 20501 (National Voter Registration Act of 1993.)

SEC. 10. DESIGNATION OF CHIEF STATE ELECTION OFFICIAL. Each State shall designate a State officer or
employee as the chief State election official to be responsible for coordination of State responsibilities under
this Act.

SEC. 12. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office—

(2) knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair
and impartially conducted election process, by—

(A) the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be
materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or

(B) the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held, shall be fined in
accordance with title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

If citizens reading clear election law and auditing the NYSVoter database found millions of potentially false, fictitious, and
fraudulent registrations and votes, the chief election official knew or reasonably should have known about these violations,
yet willfully chose to certify them as accurate and compliant.

THE NUMBER OF VOTES COUNTED MUST EQUAL
THE NUMBER OF VOTERS WHO VOTED

A simple question

When officials certified New York’s federal elections in 2020 and 2022, did certification meet the federal
standard of accuracy and compliance? To answer this, the law defining that standard must be reviewed.

There are two kinds of elections in America:

1. ACCURATE

2. INVALID

To be accurate, elections must meet extremely stringent standards. The allowable system error rate in a federal election, in
order for that election to be valid and therefore certifiable, is 1/10,000,000 ballot positions, or 1/125,000 ballots. According
to the federal election assistance commission that set this legal standard, “This rate is set at a sufficiently stringent level
such that the likelihood of voting system errors affecting the outcome of an election is exceptionally remote even in the
closest of elections.”12 When it comes to federal elections, the law says there are no honest mistakes. Because the voter rolls
are required by law to be accurate, every ballot tabulated is presumed to be from a voting eligible citizen. Thus the machine
accuracy rate logically pertains to the voting system as a whole.

Was the 2022 election valid?

With a claim of 5,965,684 votes cast, the maximum allowable number of ballots in error for New York’s 2022 general
election, in order to be a legally valid, compliant, certifiable election, is 48. NY Citizens Audit found 745,246 apparent
voting violations in excess of the legal standard.

Apparent voting violations in the 2022 GE according to NYSBOE raw data

745,294

Allowable machine errors for a valid federal election by law in 2022 GE

APPARENT VOTING VIOLATIONS IN EXCESS OF LEGAL STANDARD:

745,246

Unexamined history repeats itself

Disturbingly, the following related information regarding New York’s 2020 general election was substantially reported to
the New York State board of elections on May 9, 2022, six months prior to the 2022 general election. No attempt was made
to address the finding; it was dismissed outright and derided in the media. The certification of the 2022 general election
proceeded under the same illegitimate conditions.

Apparent voting violations in the 2020 GE according to NYSBOE raw data

960,546

Allowable machine errors for a valid federal election by law in 2020 GE

APPARENT VOTING VIOLATIONS IN EXCESS OF LEGAL STANDARD:

960,476

New York’s 2020 and 2022 elections were not provably valid under the law.
Certification appears to be a federal crime, a civil rights violation acting under color of law.

3. THE NUMBER OF VOTES COUNTED MUST EQUAL THE NUMBER OF VOTERS WHO VOTED

Documents published by the NYS Comptroller as well as the Department of Defense Inspector General identify many of
the issues presented in this report as probable cause for an investigation. The following guidance comes directly from the
Inspector General13 and the NYS Comptroller14:

COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF FRAUD INDICATORS

RED FLAGS FOR FRAUD (parenthesis added)

HAS NY CITIZENS AUDIT
UNCOVERED ELECTION FRAUD?

• Management override of
key controls.

• Lost or destroyed electronic
or hard copy records.

• Photocopied documents
instead of originals.

• “Unofficial” electronic files or
records instead of “archived” or
“official” files or records.

• Revisions to electronic or hard copy
documents with no explanation or
support.

• Use of means of alteration to
data files.

• Computer-generated dates for
modifications to electronic files
that do not fit the appropriate time
line for when they were created.

• Computer report totals that are not
supported by source documentation.

• Hostile relationship between
management and internal and/or
external auditors. This would
include domineering behavior
towards the auditor, failure to
provide information, and limiting
access to employees of the
organization.

• Failure to establish procedures to
ensure compliance with laws and
regulations and prevention of
illegal acts.

• Indications that key personnel are
not competent in the performance
of their assigned responsibilities.

• Inadequate resources to assist
personnel in performing their duties,
including personal computers,
access to information, and
temporary personnel.

• Failure to effectively follow-up on
recommendations resulting from
external reviews.

• A manager that claims disinterest
or having no knowledge about a
sensitive or high profile issue in
which you would expect management
involvement.

• Services paid for violated a Federal,
state, or local statute or regulation.

• Original documentation consistently
unavailable for the auditor’s review.

• Changes to the original documentation
that do not appear to be
authentic, such as different print
or incorrect spacing.

• Management ignores irregularities.

• Staff lacks training.

• Reluctance to provide information
to auditors.

• Management decisions are
dominated by an individual or
small group.

• Managers display significant
disrespect for regulatory bodies.

• There is a weak internal control
environment.

• Unexpected overdrafts or declines
in cash balances (votes/voters).

• Photocopied or missing documents.

• Discrepancies between bank
deposits and posting (deficits).

• Excessive number of voids.

• Increasing number of complaints
about products or service.

• Lack of physical security over
assets/inventory.

• No supporting documentation for
adjusting entries.

• Forgery.

• Creating fictitious employees
(voters) and collecting the
paychecks (votes).

• Breach of Duty.

• Series of creative “explanations.”

THE THREE BASIC TENETS OF A VALID ELECTION:

1 Voter rolls must be accurate,

2 Votes counted must be from qualified electors,

3 The number of votes counted must equal the number of voters who voted,

were all seemingly ignored in New York’s 2022 general election, as they had been in 2020.

On May 14, 1888, the United States supreme court issued an opinion, regarding an election matter in Indiana. Cited in
“Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, Eighth Edition, December 2017,” it is still considered good law:

Congress seeks by this statute to guard the election of members of Congress against any possible unfairness by
compelling, under its pains and penalties, everyone concerned in holding the election to a strict and scrupulous
observance of every duty devolved upon him while so engaged… . The evil intent consists in disobedience to the law.
(In re Coy, 127 U.S. 731)

Is this why the chief election official of New York has described the honest, completely volunteer effort of over 2,000 New
York citizens as “malicious,” “false,” and done by “bad actors”15? Charged with the public trust and paid by the citizens
they are sworn to serve, our election officials statewide have largely ignored the simple solution to meet with NY Citizens
Audit. Instead, using the false mantle of their self-appointed expertise, they have announced our claims are “baseless,”
and the provenance of our data is “fictional,” despite having provided it to us. These are the public servants who, without
providing the documentation to prove it, want us to take their word regarding our election outcomes.

The truth is, either by apathy, incompetence or malfeasance, election officials in New York have allowed the
validity of our elections to become hopelessly compromised. This is demonstrated to have occurred in 2020 and
2022, at least. No one knows who won, by the will of the people, and the boards of elections are unable and unwilling to
prove it to us. Our constitutional guarantee, of choosing the representatives we temporarily grant the privilege of writing
and enforcing laws, via accurate, compliant elections, has been abridged, and probable cause for a full investigation by law
enforcement has been demonstrated.

SUMMARY

WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND A COMPLETE END-TO-END AUDIT,
FROM CERTIFICATION THROUGH REGISTRATION,
OF THE NEW YORK STATE 2022 GENERAL ELECTION,

for both paper and electronic records, including ballots, by a mutually agreed upon external, third-party bonded auditing
firm, possessed of adequate insurance and indemnification for the handling and protection of the personal identifying
information of millions of New York citizens, in order to determine the true error rate. This audit will provide a comprehensive
report and analysis of all lapses and errors with explanation of cause where it can be determined.

We demand that this audit is completed well in advance of the upcoming 2024 primary and general elections, in order
to successfully complete all needed repairs and ensure that the results of the 2024 elections are accurate, compliant,
and trustworthy. Our domestic tranquility, as well as our responsibility to secure the blessing of liberty for the coming
generations, requires it.

“The first grand right, is that of the people having a share in their own government by
their representatives chosen by themselves, and, in consequence, of being ruled by laws,
which they themselves approve, not by edicts of men over whom they have no control.”

From “A Letter to the Inhabitants of Quebec,” October 26, 1774, unanimously signed by the
delegates to the First Continental Congress.

CONCLUSION

Notes:

1. Public Law 107–252, Help America Vote Act, 52 USC 21083, Sec. 303 (a)(2)(A)

2. Public Law 103-31, National Voter Registration Act, 52 USC 20501, Sec. 8 (i)(1)

3. Voting Systems Standards Volume 1: Performance Standards, Federal Election Commission United States of America,
April 2002, Section 3.2.1; as referenced in 52 USC 21081(5).

4. NY Citizens Audit has received copies of the NYSVoter database and county voter roll databases, via Freedom of Information
Law, from the boards of elections on multiple occasions. The first copy of NYSVoter was received on October 21, 2021.

5. US-CERT Federal Incident Notification Guidelines p. 4, “Impact Category Descriptions.”

6. This official BOE document can be read, along with NYCA responses, at
https://auditny.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Intro-to-NY-Citizens-Audit-BOE-Responses.pdf

7. https://rumble.com/v2mar94-ny-citizens-audit-presents-to-nys-legislature-election-committees-may-1-202.html

8. https://www.jinfowar.com/journal/volume-22-issue-2/caesar-cipher-stacking-deck-new-york-state-voter-rolls

9. https://www.elections.ny.gov/2020ElectionResults.html Please see the sheet labeled “Revision History”

10. https://www.elections.ny.gov/2022ElectionResults.html

11. Public Law 107–252, Help America Vote Act, 52 USC 21083 Sec. 303 (a)(1)(A)(2)(ii & viii)

12. Voting Systems Standards Volume 1: Performance Standards, Federal Election Commission United States of America, April
2002, Section 3.2.1

13. US Department of Defense, Inspector General’s Office, “Comprehensive List of Fraud Indicators,” October 2017.

14. State of New York, Office of the State Comptroller, “Red Flags for Fraud.”

15. This official BOE document can be read, along with NYCA responses, at
https://auditny.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Intro-to-NY-Citizens-Audit-BOE-Responses.pdf

NEW YORK CITIZENS AUDIT

NY Citizens Audit Civic Fund, Inc is an all-volunteer, grassroots 501(c)3 organization that began auditing New York’s
publicly available voter data in August of 2021. With over 2,000 citizens contributing, including specialists in auditing,
data analytics, law, and cyber security, NY Citizens Audit has produced several significant reports. Our reports are
designed to educate citizens, representatives, officials, and judges with an accurate, non-partisan assessment of New
York’s voting system, based on election and civil rights law, both federal and state.

To obtain voter data, volunteers with NY Citizens Audit agree not to use the information for any non-election purpose.
Therefore, NY Citizens Audit cannot provide specific voter data without an equal, binding agreement. Each of the voter
records identified in this report as suspicious has been given to federal law enforcement and the New York State board
of elections. If you desire specific information beyond what is given in this report, and you are willing to sign a
non-disclosure agreement, please contact NY Citizens Audit at info@AuditNY.com.